{"id":46828,"date":"2023-04-20T21:06:23","date_gmt":"2023-04-20T19:06:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/?p=46828"},"modified":"2023-04-21T01:03:16","modified_gmt":"2023-04-20T23:03:16","slug":"a-crazy-fellow","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/a-crazy-fellow\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00abA Crazy Fellow\u00bb"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Marginalia to Rudolf Steiner\u2019s Life and Work, Number 25.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p>Before Rudolf Steiner met the famous reciter Alexander Strakosch in person, he had heard much about him from his friend Moritz Zitter. On January 14 and 16, 1892, Strakosch performed various poetic works at the Weimar Hoftheater, including Faust\u2019s great monologue and a scene from Schiller\u2019s \u2039Demetrius\u203a. Apparently, he sat talking with Rudolf Steiner for some time after the performance. It was close to midnight, when, \u00abmoved by the heightened temperature to bold declarations of friendship\u00bb, they wrote a boozy postcard to Moritz Zitter.<span id='easy-footnote-1-46828' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/a-crazy-fellow\/#easy-footnote-bottom-1-46828' title='Moritz Zitter to Rosa Mayreder on February 7, 1892 (Rudolf Steiner Archives).'><sup>1<\/sup><\/a><\/span> Zitter referred to the conversation in a letter on February 2, 1892, \u00abYou must have spoken of me very favourably, by the way, for he is totally delighted. Of you, he only speaks in superlatives!\u00bb<span id='easy-footnote-2-46828' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/a-crazy-fellow\/#easy-footnote-bottom-2-46828' title='As early as January 26, 1892, Zitter wrote to Alexander Strakosch, \u00abI must tell you how delighted I am that you revere Dr. Steiner as much as I do. I must admit that, until I found you, he was my only friend, and that there is no love or sacrifice I would not devote to him\u00bb (RSA). The letter also reveals that Strakosch helped Zitter financially and tried to find a position for him.'><sup>2<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Alexander Strakosch (born in Sebeskellemes, Hungary on December 3, 1840, died Berlin September 17, 1909), the son of a Jewish merchant, stuck out as a child because of his exceptional memory, which allowed him to recite long poems and the entire Book of Job by heart. He was therefore expected to become a preacher but trained as an accountant in Vienna and studied acting on the side. Being small in stature with the \u00abhead of a giant\u00bb<span id='easy-footnote-3-46828' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/a-crazy-fellow\/#easy-footnote-bottom-3-46828' title='From an obituary, see footnote 9.'><sup>3<\/sup><\/a><\/span> meant, however, that he was not really suited to acting. \u00a0Instead, he discovered the art of recitation for himself and went to Paris to study it. Later he worked as master reciter under Heinrich Laube at the Burgtheater and at the Volkstheater in Vienna. He became so famous that he could undertake grand tours of Europe, Turkey, and America. At the end of his career, he taught at the Max Reinhardt drama school in Berlin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Strakosch married four times. Following the early death of his first wife, Toni F\u00fcrst (1852-1873), he married Anna G\u00f6tzel (1852-1911) in 1874. The couple divorced in 1890 and Anna immediately married the then-popular writer Gustav Freytag. In January 1892, Rudolf Steiner learned to his great surprise from Alexander Strakosch that his divorced wife was a childhood friend of Helene Specht. Rudolf Steiner had spent six years with the Specht family in Vienna as a private tutor. In a letter to Pauline Specht he wrote, \u00abHe told me something I had not known: that he used to be a frequent visitor to your home and that the present Mrs. Freytag was a close friend of your sister\u2019s. Amazing!\u00bb<span id='easy-footnote-4-46828' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/a-crazy-fellow\/#easy-footnote-bottom-4-46828' title='Letter on January 20, 1892, in Rudolf Steiner, S\u00e4mtliche Briefe 2, Basel 2023, p. 334.'><sup>4<\/sup><\/a><\/span> Strakosch also remarried: in 1891 he wed Ortrud Menzel in Silesia. The dissolution of this third marriage in 1902 casts an interesting light on the cultural conditions at that time. \u00abProfessor Strakosch is Israeli, his wife was a Protestant. Since such a mixed marriage is not permitted under Austrian law, proceedings for annulment were soon initiated.\u00bb At least the children from this marriage were \u00abgranted legitimacy.\u00bb<span id='easy-footnote-5-46828' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/a-crazy-fellow\/#easy-footnote-bottom-5-46828' title='\u2039Illustrirtes Wiener Extrablatt\u203a June 10 1902, p. 10.'><sup>5<\/sup><\/a><\/span> A fourth marriage followed six weeks before his death, to his student Leopoldine Konstantin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A few days after the Weimar meeting mentioned above, Strakosch sent greetings from Munich to his \u00abdear, dear friend\u00bb Rudolf Steiner, \u00abstill deeply moved\u00bb and \u00abeternally grateful for the unparalleled kindness and friendship.\u00bb<span id='easy-footnote-6-46828' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/a-crazy-fellow\/#easy-footnote-bottom-6-46828' title='Letter on January 19, 1892, RSA.'><sup>6<\/sup><\/a><\/span> And in a long letter on January 30, 1892, he wrote, \u00abFrom the deepest depths of my heart I thank you for the letter in which I took great delight. You cannot know how dear you are to me.\u00bb The effusive tone of these letters explains Rudolf Steiner\u2019s letter to Pauline Specht on January 20, 1892: \u00abThis Strakosch is such a crazy fellow! A leftover romantic with some true underlying feeling wrapped in a never-ending jumble of phrases and false pathos. I\u2019m not talking about his declamatory art but his behaviour in ordinary life. He places every word on a stilt and there they strut along in the drollest way \u2013 excessive masses of stilted words.\u00bb<span id='easy-footnote-7-46828' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/a-crazy-fellow\/#easy-footnote-bottom-7-46828' title='Cf. footnote 3, p. 334.'><sup>7<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-buhnenkunst-braucht-temperament\">The Art of the Stage Needs Temperament<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Rudolf Steiner must have met Strakosch again later in Berlin and must have had the chance to see him working with actors because he referred to this repeatedly. In his 1924 \u2039Speech and Drama\u203a course, for instance, he said that Strakosch was \u00abmore disposed to train the students with a strong hand. It was really most interesting to watch how old Strakosch broke them in, going about it, you must understand, with the best will in the world, and not without something of real art in his method, judged from the standpoint of his time. When Strakosch was ramming something home to a pupil you might have seen that pupil, at one moment standing bolt upright, and at the very next moment feeling as though Strakosch were going to dislocate his limbs, were going to bend his hip till the ends of the bone stuck out. Then again at another time you might have seen the pupil lying on the floor, with Strakosch on top of him, and that perhaps just when a performance was due to begin and so on, through many other varieties of treatment. But there was temperament in all this. And the art of the stage needs temperament.\u00bb<span id='easy-footnote-8-46828' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/a-crazy-fellow\/#easy-footnote-bottom-8-46828' title='Lecture on September 13, 1924, in Rudolf Steiner\/Marie Steiner-von Sivers, \u2039Speech and Drama\u203a, GA 282, p. 224, New York 2007, translated by Mary Adams.'><sup>8<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A few days later he said of Alexander Strakosch that he had \u00abconsiderable influence\u00bb as a reciter but that he was not a good director or actor and that later on he \u00abwas too fond of mannerisms, especially on the stage. But in one thing Strakosch was really skillful. He was able, while forming his speech, to enter right into the inner experience of it. [\u2026] Strakosch would [\u2026] let the character build itself up before him as he listened.\u00bb Rudolf Steiner related how he asked Strakosch in a discussion on Shakespeare where professors and actors were present, \u00abTell us now, how do you understand Hamlet? \u2013 Very inwardly! That was all he would say. He had heard what Hamlet says, had formed his speaking quite wonderfully to correspond, but could say nothing about the part except that it was deep down within him, &#8211; the fact being that he had hardly had time to get beyond the hearing of it, no time to develop a rational interpretation.\u00bb (September 23, 1924, GA 282)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It can be assumed that Rudolf Steiner had Alexander Strakosch in mind when, in his lectures on eurythmy, he pointed out again and again that when reciting for eurythmy one had to return to the old forms of recitation that were still in use in the nineteenth century. In an obituary for Strakosch we read, \u00abIn him, we have the most excellent solution for the problem of the mind dominating the voice. [\u2026] The modern age will not understand how one can delight in what has been \u2039outlived\u203a, no, but in the \u2039living\u203a experience! One needs to have experienced, to have heard Strakosch, and the heart will grow warm again and the mind glow when one remembers his artistry. The Ibsen cult and its school will not outshine the old, elevating pathos; for there are things both in art and in ordinary life that can only be raised by pathos to fulfill their mission. \u2013 The dominion of the mind over the voice!\u00bb<span id='easy-footnote-9-46828' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/a-crazy-fellow\/#easy-footnote-bottom-9-46828' title='Reinhold Braun: Alexander Strakosch, in \u2039Die Stimme, Centralblatt f\u00fcr Stimm- und Tonbildung\u203a, Berlin 1909\/1910, p. 244. Strakosch\u2019s art of speaking is described here as follows: \u00abThe artist\u2019s profoundly feeling soul was able to express, unforgettably, the rage of a lion and the smile of a sleeping child. The brazen, bare metal supported the finest feeling with bell-like magic. Nothing coarse or unhewn ever emerged from him. Subtle pain trembled away in delicate gossamer balls; sweetness floated from his lips like the song of an aeolian harp; wrath struck the listener\u2019s soul like thunderous drumbeat, sudden, wild pain like the sound of shattered fanfares. He was able to symbolize and paint pictures with his expression! The harp-like resonance! The vowels were brazen sounds, the \u2039sh\u203a consonants, if necessary, hissing serpents. Unforgettable his \u2039R\u203a! Unbroken force to the last day and unfading beauty. Strakosch was also a dietician of the voice. Many pupils will thank the master for this \u2039R\u203a. [\u2026] The range of feelings held by his soul; his tonal range! The transformative power of his voice was phenomenal. This could only be achieved by one who mastered his voice down to the subtlest nuance. [\u2026] Innermost experience of art and mastering of our organ of speech!\u00bb'><sup>9<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Rudolf Steiner\u2019s acquaintance with the famous reciter had an interesting sequel: on March 26, 1908, he gave a lecture on \u2039Sun, Moon, and Stars\u203a at the Architektenhaus in Berlin, which was attended not only by Wassily Kandinsky but also by his student Maria Strakosch-Giesler (1877-1970) and her husband, the engineer Alexander Strakosch (1879-1958). Deeply moved, the latter recounts how, after the lecture, the couple walked up to Rudolf Steiner hand in hand to introduce themselves. \u00abI gave my name and first name, and he looked at me and said, astonished but not unfriendly, \u2039But that\u2019s not who you are.\u203a Taken aback, I repeated that I certainly was. But he said, \u2039I know him and you are not him.\u203a In the end, he kindly invited us to visit him the next afternoon. (I had no idea then that Rudolf Steiner was acquainted with the famous reciter and dramaturg of the Vienna Burgtheater who was also called Alexander Strakosch, a cousin of my father, and that he thought I pretended to be him.)\u00bb<span id='easy-footnote-10-46828' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/a-crazy-fellow\/#easy-footnote-bottom-10-46828' title='Alexander Strakosch, \u2039Lebenswege mit Rudolf Steiner. Erinnerungen\u203a. Dornach 1994, p. 25f.'><sup>10<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Alexander Strakosch, the great-nephew of the reciter Alexander Strakosch, and his wife became esoteric pupils and important co-workers of Rudolf Steiner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Translation<\/strong> Margot M. Saar<br><strong>Image<\/strong> Alexander Strakosch<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Marginalia to Rudolf Steiner\u2019s Life and Work, Number 25. Before Rudolf Steiner met the famous reciter Alexander Strakosch in person, he had heard much about him from his friend Moritz Zitter. On January 14 and 16, 1892, Strakosch performed various poetic works at the Weimar Hoftheater, including Faust\u2019s great monologue and a scene from Schiller\u2019s \u2039Demetrius\u203a. Apparently, he sat talking with Rudolf Steiner for some time after the performance. It was close to midnight, when, \u00abmoved by the heightened temperature [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9190,"featured_media":46290,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8846,11323],"tags":[11318,8814],"class_list":["post-46828","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-history","category-speech-formation","tag-2023-13-en","tag-musings"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46828","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9190"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46828"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46828\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/46290"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dasgoetheanum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}